A Problem With the Monetary Unit Assumption is That

Budgetary Unit Assumption: Definition

The
monetary unit supposition states that all bookkeeping records should be made in terms of budgetary units. The monetary unit of measurement supposition is also known equally the
money measurement concept.

All transactions are measured in monetary units and recorded in the books of accounts in terms of money, which is generally the currency unit used in a country.

In the United states of america, for case, all accounting records are maintained in terms of the Us dollar. A multinational company, however, may maintain accounts in dual currencies.

Budgetary Unit of measurement Assumption: Explanation

A famous saying is:
Money is what money does. This ways that money acts as a standard unit to measure the value of appurtenances and services.

Under the budgetary unit assumption, it is assumed that only those transactions with monetary value should be recorded in the books of accounts.

In other words, according to this concept, the only transactions that should exist recorded in the books of accounts are those that can be measured in terms of money.

Problems can arise due to variations in the value of money and ignorance of qualitative factors such as quality of management and growth of contest. However, the money measurement concept is accustomed for its adjustability and understandability.

The monetary unit assumption
is based on the assumption that all transactions tin be measured in money terms.

Now, it is standard practice for documents on which accounting records are based to be issued in terms of money. For this reason, maintaining accounting records in terms of coin does not lead to any problems.

Another of import issue is the assumption well-nigh the stability of the monetary unit of measurement’south value. In reality, aggrandizement erodes the value of budgetary units, just accounting records are based on the assumption that a monetary unit has a stable value.

To properly account for the results of the operations of a business entity, the results need to be expressed and recorded in common units of measurement.

It is well-known that a business organization may have diverse kinds of assets, including land and buildings, government securities and shares of other companies, inventories of raw materials and finished goods, and cash and claims against debtors.

However, it is impossible to add together upwards all a company’s assets in a direct way. For example, there is no way to add together upward thousands of square feet of building space with tons of coal and numbers of banknotes.

This is due to differences concerning the physical nature of the measurement units.

This trouble—often referred to as the “apples and oranges” trouble—is resolved by adding, for the purposes of accounting, the common economic value of avails (and liabilities) expressed in monetary terms rather than other physical dimensions.

It is possible to resolve the apples and oranges problem in this way because cash, disparate physical appurtenances, and claims confronting others tin usually exist expressed in terms of money. As such, money lends itself to common measurement and accounting.

Importantly, this concept introduces many complexities in accounting in the sense that assets which cannot be accurately expressed in terms of monetary units are not usually reflected in concern accounts.

Example

Nether the budgetary unit supposition, an asset purchased for $12,000 in 2003 and another asset purchased for $12,000 in 2016 would have the same cost. They would incur the same depreciation charge for accounting purposes.